{"id":4949,"date":"2024-03-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2024-03-26T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dwjqp1.com\/2020-election-trump-justice-attorney-19d8af3b8cd17c67af8a327ac9a815a1\/"},"modified":"2024-03-26T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2024-03-26T00:00:00","slug":"2020-election-trump-justice-attorney-19d8af3b8cd17c67af8a327ac9a815a1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dwjqp1.com\/2020-election-trump-justice-attorney-19d8af3b8cd17c67af8a327ac9a815a1\/","title":{"rendered":"Trump ally Jeffrey Clark disciplinary hearing begins over role trying to overturn 2020 election"},"content":{"rendered":"
WASHINGTON (AP) \u2014 Former Justice Department official Jeffrey Clark\u2019s efforts to help then-President Donald Trump overturn the 2020 election<\/a> were characterized Tuesday as a coup attempt by Washington, D.C., Office of Disciplinary Counsel at a hearing to determine if Clark should be sanctioned.<\/p>\n Clark is accused of attempting to engage in dishonest conduct during his role in aftermath<\/a> of the last presidential election.<\/p>\n Much of the hearing before the three-member Board of Responsibility focused on a letter which Clark sent to his superiors at the time, Jeffrey Rosen and Richard Donoghue. Clark suggested the letter be sent to Georgia<\/a> indicating that the Justice Department was investigating irregularities in the state\u2019s election and state lawmakers should void Biden\u2019s electoral win. <\/p>\n Hamilton Fox III, the disciplinary counsel at the hearing, said the letter and Clark\u2019s continued attempts to intercede on Trump\u2019s behalf, including multiple meetings with Trump in violation Justice Department procedure, were \u201cessentially a coup attempt at the Department of Justice.\u201d<\/p>\n Clark\u2019s attorney, Harry MacDougald, said the action being taken against his client was unprecedented. He said the letter was not supposed to have been public and should have fallen under various privilege protections. He added that the letter was part of the debate that normally occurs between lawyers. He said punishing Clark in those circumstances would have a \u201cchilling effect,\u201d a point that Donoghue agreed with during the cross examination portion of his testimony when he said it could discourage people from \u201cbeing as candid as they otherwise might be.\u201d<\/p>\n <\/a><\/p>\n READ MORE<\/p>\n Trump slow to invest in states that could decide election as some in GOP fear \u2018skeleton\u2019 campaign<\/a><\/p>\n Hurry up and wait: Trump\u2019s classified documents case is mired in delays that may run past election<\/a><\/p>\n AP-NORC Poll: Trump evokes more anger and fear from Democrats than Biden does from Republicans<\/a><\/p>\n Much of the hearing played like a rerun of the fraud claims from the 2020 election and the House Jan. 6 committee testimony, including a rehash of the dramatic Jan. 3, 2021 meeting when several attorneys within the White House and Justice Department threatened to quit<\/a> if Trump fired Rosen as the acting attorney general and named Clark.<\/p>\n
\n<\/a><\/p>\n
\n<\/a><\/p>\n
\n<\/a><\/p>\n